Khari Johnson v. Adecco Employment Services and Sedgwick CMS

In Khari Johnson v. Adecco Employment Services and Sedgwick CMS the claimant requested a $2,000 advance. The JCC found claimant was a proper claimant, but ultimately concluded there was no proof that claimant’s current financial needs were due to the effects of the workplace accident. Without proper evidence of “plausible nexus” the JCC DENIED the motion for advance without prejudice.

Leave a Reply