Gilda Louden v. UPS and Liberty Mutual Insurance
In Gilda Louden v. UPS and Liberty Mutual Insurance finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
KOTLER LAW | Workers Compensation Lawyer
In Gilda Louden v. UPS and Liberty Mutual Insurance finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
In Johnny Cobb v. National DCP and Sedgwick CMS finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
In Arlencia Johnson v. HCA Florida Capital Hospital and Broadspire Services, Inc. finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
In Jazmenn Wolley v. Indian River Select Freshco and USIS finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
In Harold English v. Pepsico Inc. and Sedgwick CMS, Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America finding claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a $2,000 advance, the JCC GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance.
In Gary Hard v. Cardinal Glass Industries Inc and Sentry Casualty Company claimant petitioned for an advance the JCC found that Claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for an advance, and GRANTED claimant’s motion, but limited the amount to $1,500.00 based upon the evidence provided.
In Michelle Meletiche v. Aerotek Staffing Agency and ESIS WC Claims the Claimant filed a motion for a $2,000 advance and the E/C agreed to the advance. The JCC entered an order approving claimant’s motion.
In Travis Lamone Benjamin v. Sheet Metal Masters and FRSA Self Insurers Fund, Inc Claimant requested a $2,000 advance. The JCC accepted the claimants testimony that the could not afford an IME and found an advance of $1,000 was reasonable under the circumstances. Claimant’s motion GRANTED, in part.
In Kayling Rascher v. Brinks, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company, Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. Claimant petitioned for a 2k advance. The JCC found that Claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for an advance, but limited the amount to $1,000.00 based upon the evidence provided.
In Rinst Joseph v. Market Refrigeration, Inc. and Zenith Insurance Company Claimant petitioned for a 2k advance. The JCC found that the claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for a 2k advance. Claimant’s motion for advance GRANTED.