KOTLER LAW | Workers Compensation Lawyer

#motionforadvance

Melissa Bojanowski v. 1409 Physicians Regional Health System and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.

In Melissa Bojanowski v. 1409 Physicians Regional Health System and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. Claimant requested a $2,000 advance. The JCC found the claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements and GRANTED claimant’s motion for advance. The JCC also rejected the E/C suggestion that an alleged overpayment was equivalent to an advance.

Diana Rollo v. Consulate Health Care, Consulate Health Care d/b/a Lavie Care Centers d/b/a Consulate Health Care of and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., American Zurich Insurance Company

In Diana Rollo v. Consulate Health Care, Consulate Health Care d/b/a Lavie Care Centers d/b/a Consulate Health Care of and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., American Zurich Insurance Company the JCC found that Claimant met the entitlement and eligibility requirements for an advance, and GRANTED claimant’s more for advance, but limited the amount to $1,834.00 based …

Diana Rollo v. Consulate Health Care, Consulate Health Care d/b/a Lavie Care Centers d/b/a Consulate Health Care of and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., American Zurich Insurance Company Read More »

Jesus Hernandez v. Asplundh Tree Expert and Sedgwick CMS, XL Insurance America

In Jesus Hernandez v. Asplundh Tree Expert and Sedgwick CMS, XL Insurance America the Claimant filed a financial Affidavit in conjunction with his Motion and E/C filed a Response in Opposition to Claimant’s Motion for Advance. After review of the financial affidavit, the JCC found enough evidence for claimant to meet the entitlement and eligibility …

Jesus Hernandez v. Asplundh Tree Expert and Sedgwick CMS, XL Insurance America Read More »

Eduardo Barrera v. Labor Finders and ESIS WC Claims

In Eduardo Barrera v. Labor Finders and ESIS WC Claims the Claimant filed a Motion for Advance of Compensation Benefits. The claim for determination at the hearing was whether the Claimant is entitled to a $1,000.00 advance. The JCC found that the claimant did meet the entitlement and eligibility requirements for securing an advance for …

Eduardo Barrera v. Labor Finders and ESIS WC Claims Read More »

Thomas Campbell Jr. v. Yum! Brands and KFC

Orlando Workers Comp Thomas Campbell Jr. v. Yum! Brands and KFC (Gallagher Bassett Services and Indemnity Insurance) | Orlando Workers Comp Thomas Campbell Jr. v. Yum! Brands and KFC, an Orlando workers’ compensation case, addressed a motion to advance. The claimant proved that they were eligible for another advance and that their request would not …

Thomas Campbell Jr. v. Yum! Brands and KFC Read More »