KOTLER LAW | Workers Compensation Lawyer

#TPD

Honorio Flores v. Smart Specialty Solutions, Inc. and The Main Street America Group

Leave a Comment / Workers Comp / By

In Honoria Flores v. Smart Specialty Solutions, Inc. and the Main Street America Group the vocational experts in this PTD matter disagreed as to whether claimant had transferable skills and was able to perform sedentary duty work within a 50 mile radius of his home. Claimant was a 64 year old Spanish speaking man, unable …

Honorio Flores v. Smart Specialty Solutions, Inc. and The Main Street America Group Read More »

Ronald Shomaker v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners and Commercial Risk Management, Inc.

Leave a Comment / Workers Comp / By

In Ronald Shomaker v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners and Commercial Risk Management, Inc. the Claimant filed a Verified Petition for Attorney’s Fees and Costs. The value of all of the benefits secured is $179,129.80. The value of the indemnity benefits is $177,497.80. A statutory fee solely on the indemnity benefits is $18,499.78. The …

Ronald Shomaker v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners and Commercial Risk Management, Inc. Read More »

Matthew Casey v. City of Hallandale Beach Police Department

Leave a Comment / Workers Comp / By

In Matthew Casey v. City of Hallandale Beach Police Department and Preferred Government Claims Solutions, the E/C previously offered compensation for claimant. The claimant was diagnosed with PTSD, which as an occupational disease, had multiple dates of accident. Seeing as PTSD followed the original accident, newly enacted Florida Statute 112.1815(5)(a) applied, entitling the claimant to …

Matthew Casey v. City of Hallandale Beach Police Department Read More »

Rodrigo Camacho v. Kim’s Painting/Norguard, NV Acquisition Mgmt, Epic Development

Leave a Comment / Workers Comp / By

The case of Rodrigo Camacho involved three different E/C’s; Kim’s Painting/Norguard (E/C#1), NV Acquisition Management(E/C#2) and Epic Development(E/C#3). The site of the accident was owned by E/C#2, and the Claimant was contracted by E/C#1. The claimant was classified as an employee of E/C #1 based upon Florida Statute 440.02(15)(a) and 440.02(15)(c)3. Contractors are responsible for …

Rodrigo Camacho v. Kim’s Painting/Norguard, NV Acquisition Mgmt, Epic Development Read More »

Maurcio Ovidio Garmendia Lopez v. Gorilla Construction

Leave a Comment / Workers Comp / By

In Maurcio Ovidio Garmendia Lopez v. Gorilla Construction, the E/C was both uninsured and absent from the final hearing. The Claimant petitioned with evidence from their IME doctor. Since they made their claim without contention, they were granted to TTD benefits, though TPD benefits were barred on the lack of evidence provided after a certain …

Maurcio Ovidio Garmendia Lopez v. Gorilla Construction Read More »